2012/3/8 Martin Günther <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>> What do you think? Are there people interested in such interface?
>> Should we make a REP?
> I would be interested in such an interface, but I'm not sure if enough
> other people are to justify a REP (comments, anyone?). Maybe you just go
> on and define these messages in a separate message package (what about
> the name htn_msgs or htn_planning_msgs?), and others can adapt it.
I suggest starting with an API review for your specific
implementation. That will likely provide useful feedback, and enable
other ROS users to experiment with your stack.