Re: [ros-users] Current state of SMACH in ROS
|This message is part of the following thread:|
|the complete thread tree sorted by date|
|Jack O'Quin at|
|Herman Bruyninckx at|
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Ingo Lütkebohle <email@example.com> wrote: > I agree, and we deliberately only use a subset of SCXML's > functionality, with other features being rejected at design time. > However, everything that I want to express in a state-machine > language, I can express in it. That's a very good start, in my > opinion, and something that is otherwise lacking.